L3 model — actions — Chernobyl trio · tap sections
I choreographed a trio. My choreographic intent was to explore the Chernobyl disaster — an invisible contamination spreading through a community.
Gesture was the primary action throughout — I choreographed small, everyday gestures (a wave, a reaching hand, a glance toward someone) as the opening vocabulary of the piece.
This was effective because ordinary gestures established the normalcy of daily life before the disaster. By choosing the smallest, most human-scale actions, I made the contamination's effect on them all the more devastating when they began to fail.
Stillness was used at the exact moment of the disaster — all three dancers freezing simultaneously mid-gesture.
This was effective because the stillness communicated the moment of rupture — the world pausing at the point of catastrophe. The freeze mid-gesture made the interruption feel violent rather than peaceful.
Floorwork increased across the middle and final sections — each dancer progressively moving to lower levels, spending more and more time on the ground.
This communicated the physical effects of radiation — the body losing its ability to remain upright, being drawn downward. The increasing use of floorwork traced the progression of contamination through the body.
Transfer of weight was used in the final section — one dancer leaning into another, depending on them to remain standing.
This communicated the human instinct to support each other under catastrophe — and the impossible weight of trying to hold someone up when you yourself are failing. The transfer of weight made the human cost physical rather than abstract.
Using different body parts was a deliberate action choice — I choreographed the contamination sequence so it began in the hands, spread through the arms, into the torso, and finally to the whole body.
This was effective because the sequential spread of affected body parts made contamination visible and directional — the audience could track exactly where it had reached, communicating the progressive nature of radiation poisoning.
🟢 Name + Example — Gesture named, specific examples given: waving, reaching, glancing. These are identifiable as everyday rather than theatrical.
🌿 Explain + Intent — "Smallest, most human-scale actions" — justifies the choice by linking the action type to the choreographic strategy. The "fail" is powerful.
🟢 Name + Example — Stillness named, located precisely: at the moment of disaster, all three, mid-gesture.
🌿 Explain + Intent — "Mid-gesture made the interruption feel violent" — distinguishes this stillness from peaceful stillness. Action type is doing conceptual work.
🟢 Name + Example — Floorwork described as progressive: increasing across sections, more time on the ground each time.
🌿 Explain + Intent — "Traced the progression of contamination through the body." The floorwork is not just visual — it maps the disaster.
🟢 Name + Example — Transfer of weight named, described: one dancer leaning on another to remain standing.
🌿 Explain + Intent — "Impossible weight of trying to hold someone up when you yourself are failing" — the action communicates the human cost with precision.
🟢 Name + Example — Using different body parts as a deliberate strategy: hands → arms → torso → full body.
🌿 Explain + Intent — "Sequential spread made contamination visible and directional" — the action choice maps the spread of the disaster. Five items = full L3.
Name + Example
Explain — why effective for intent